I don't see how she could leave the house go and be with another man and then come back too me and our kids.
It’s called "compartmentalization" - look it up. Easiest example is public safety workers (fire, police, ER drs/nurses/staff, etc) in that their brains have to find a way to not bring the horrific things they see/experience at work into their day-to-day (or personal) lives. Compartmentalization is not an excuse for an A. It’s a technical explanation for how a WS can purge their guilt/shame in order to carry on both the A AND their M.
And that technical explanation does not (or did not for me) help one effing bit with all the feelings of invisibility, abandonment, etc that a BS may experience.
IMO, the "how can they" x or y or z (ranging from sleeping with their AP and then sleeping with their BS hours later to texting AP during family dinner, with a TON of crap in between) that can pretty well haunt us for months after dday may be a way for our brains to try and process the bigger question of WHO IS MY SPOUSE? It’s reconciling the person we thought they were, with the person their actions have shown them to be. It’s a mind f*ck for sure.
Also, as a to the "we need to focus on the future" - that crap needs to leave her vocabulary, in a forever kind of way. Hopefully she’ll get there (and HOPEFULLY there is not some IC or MC or podcast or whatever reinforcing it). First of all, this is a YEARS long endeavor. YOU need to focus on healing you, and it takes the dreaded four letter T-I-M-E. If she’s not up for that, you two may want to rethink whether a commitment to R is appropriate at this juncture. it is NOT uncommon - at all - for a BS in successful R to have issues come up years/decades later. It’s a frigging TRAUMA. We don’t tell combat vets with PTSD that they need to stop having triggers on July 4… we THANK them for their service and ask what we can to to help and support them through those kind of triggering events, whether the combat they saw was 5 or 50 years earlier. Likewise, a WS who is doing their work, finding/found remorse, and committed to R, will THANK the BS for committing to R, and then offer whatever help / support they can. IMO, it’s how everyone should treat those upon whom our actions have foisted harm (whether infidelity or just being a shitty person sometimes).
I think others touched on this as well, but there is NOTHING about her AP that is "better" or otherwise diminishes your value. Generally, it’s about how the wayward feels from the A, rather than the AP him/herself. It takes a lot of time/effort for some BS (starting with myself) to get that through our noggins. We can spend a lot of time & energy focusing on how much "better" we are than an AP, starting with the moral high road, and leading all kinds of places hither & yon. And, at least IME, it doesn’t really get to the meat of things, of what the WS "got" from the A that allowed them to cross the line.
A WS didn’t embark on the A bc of who the AP is… they do it bc of how the AP makes them feel about THEMSELVES. It’s a truly selfish act, cloaked in projection upon the AP (and I believe that is mutual for both the WS and AP - who may have their own BS). The AP could have been ANYONE (fat or skinny, rich or poor, pleasant or a jerk, a PhD or a physical laborer, etc) who made the WS feel something(s) they wanted to feel (wanted, visible, powerful, sexy, etc). I think we BS really want to rationalize the A as happening bc of something special (or better) about the AP, so that we don’t have to really reconcile that ‘who is my spouse’ piece, and think that so long as that nasty AP is out of our lives, we are with safe partners. The thing is, it’s not as if the A would not have happened “but for” the AP. Rather, the A would not have happened “but for” the WS making the conscious CHOICE to do so.
[This message edited by gmc94 at 5:06 PM, Friday, February 4th]